Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Michael Smith v. Kimberly Butler, et al
as 21-3082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY BUTLER, TRACY LEE, Lieutenant, CEDRIC A. MCDONNOUGH and others
Asher Hill v. Dennis Meyer, et al
as 21-2884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHER B. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS MEYER, Doctor, RUTHIE JIMERSON, KIM HOBSON and others
Smith v. Stevens et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Misty Forwe, Bradley Shields, Taylor Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Stevens et al
as 3:2021cv00533
Defendant:
Connie Houston, Kimberly Birch, S. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Birch et al
as 3:2021cv00534
Defendant:
S. Stevens, Caldwell, Kimberly Birch and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALIGA v. INDIANA HORSE RACING COMMISSION et al
as 1:2021cv00472
Defendant:
KEVIN GUMM, DAVE MAGEE, INDIANA HORSE RACING COMMISSION STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BALIGA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALL v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00093
Defendant:
THOMAS WATSON, Michael Smith and THOMAS J. WATSON
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MICHAEL HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lamarr Crittenden v. Bruce Ippel, et al
as 20-3479
Defendant / Appellee:
BRUCE IPPEL, Doctor, HEATHER DAVIS, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES OF INDIANA L.L.C and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMARR T. CRITTENDEN
Smith v. Kuforiji et al
as 3:2021cv00097
Defendant:
Misty Forwe, Penny George, S. Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. MEND Correctional Care
as 4:2020cv04274
Plaintiff:
Juwan Crawford, Eddie Rigsby, Michael Stromer and others
Defendant:
MEND Correctional Care
Interested Party:
Jerowimo Price, Jonathan Robinson, Adell L Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
