Cases 11 - 20 of 238
DuPage v. Butler et al
as 1:2023cv01242
Plaintiff:
Joshua DuPage
Defendant:
Brett Butler, . Burris, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Potchka v. Pekin Insurance
as 3:2023cv00448
Defendant:
JANELLE POTCHKA, Personal Representative of the Estate of BILLY SIMPSON and PEKIN INSURANCE
Plaintiff:
Janelle Potchka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Carter v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2023cv01190
Petitioner:
Ladale Carter
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fenderson v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01146
Petitioner:
Tereze L Fenderson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pekin Insurance Company v. Walmart Inc.
as 1:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
WALMART INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SOUTHWOOD et al v. PEKIN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN SOUTHWOOD, TRISTAN SOUTHWOOD and CARISSA SOUTHWOOD
Defendant:
PEKIN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Joseph Whipps v. K. Bennett
as 23-1289
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH JOHN WHIPPS
Respondent / Appellee:
K. BENNETT, Warden, FCI Pekin
Gordon v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01469
Petitioner:
Alxleotold Gordon
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pekin Insurance Company v. Gree USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03126
Plaintiff:
Pekin Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gree USA, Inc. and Gree Electric Appliances, Inc. of Zhuhai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
