Cases 11 - 19 of 19
PATEL v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv00454
Defendant:
PATRICIA O'HARA, PIKUL PATEL, 101 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING and others
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bobby R. Long v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-3386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY R. LONG
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE BIDEN, Vice President of the United States, HARRY REID, Congressperson, NANCY PELOSI, Congressperson and all other members of the United States Congress and others
LONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2014cv01353
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, BARACK OBAMA, NANCY PELOSI and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ejlali v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv13504
Plaintiff:
Mary Pelosi Ejlali
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyrrall Cannon v. USA, et al
as 08-3898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRRALL F. CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARACK H. OBAMA, U.S. Senator, JESSE L. JACKSON, Operation Push and others
Cannon v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv04930
Plaintiff:
Tyrrall Farrow Cannon
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Obama, Jesse Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coats v. Bush et al
as 3:2007cv50058
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Coats
Defendant:
George W Bush, Richard B. Cheney, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 3:2007cv03045
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Defendant:
Stewart Hudson, George W Bush, A Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fontanez v. Doyle et al
as 1:2007cv00098
Plaintiff:
Fernando Fontanez
Defendant:
James Doyle, Robert Carlson, Larry Zarletti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
