Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
William Shaw v. County of Milwaukee, et al
as 21-1083
Defendant / Appellee: MILWAUKEE COUNTY, WISCONSIN, JOHN CHISOLM, NICHOLAS STACHULA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM R. SHAW
Shaw v. City of Milwaukee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01059
Defendant: Michael Antoniak, Daniel Teska, Terrence Gordon and others
Plaintiff: William R Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. NEAL
as 1:2019cv01887
Respondent: RON NEAL
Petitioner: TROY R. SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaw v. Schmidt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01665
Petitioner: William R Shaw
Respondent: Richard Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00065
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shaw v. Lemke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02022
Petitioner: Brandon R Shaw
Respondent: Michael Lemke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Troy Shaw v. Brett Mize We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1628
Petitioner - Appellant: TROY R. SHAW
Respondent - Appellee: BRETT MIZE
SHAW v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv01315
Plaintiff: DONALD R. SHAW
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Type: Torts - Injury None
SHAW v. WILSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00325
Petitioner: TROY R. SHAW
Respondent: WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dee Childrous v. John Birkel, et al
as 09-2448
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEE ARLISE CHILDROUS
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN BIRKEL, Medical Technician, CLETUS R. SHAW, Correctional Lieutenant and DOCTOR KURIAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?