Cases 11 - 20 of 429
Cabe et al v. Evergreen Packaging LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Cabe, Sean Frey, Anita Poteete and others
Defendant:
Evergreen Packaging LLC and Pactiv Evergreen Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ruiz v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Mary A Ruiz
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Israel Ruiz v. Wallace Strow, et al
as 24-1172
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL RUIZ
Defendant:
WALLACE STROW, Dentist and ROBIN RANDOLPH, Dental Assistant
Antonia Gonzalez-Nunez v. Jose Caballero Lopez, et al
as 24-1141
Plaintiff:
ANTONIA M. GONZALEZ-NUNEZ
Defendant:
JOSE A. CABALLERO LOPEZ, Judge, ALBERTO VALCARCEL RUIZ, Judge, incorrectly sued as Alberto Varcacel Ruiz, GLORIA M. DE JESUS MACHARGO, Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Caballero-Lopez et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Jose A Caballero-Lopez, Alberto Varcacel-Ruiz, Gloria M De Jesus Machargo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Allen et al v. City of et al
as 1:2023cv16748
Plaintiff:
Mr. Mario Allen and Jeffrey Morrow
Defendant:
Chicago City of, Kevin Taylor, Gabriel Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
