Cases 11 - 20 of 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Simms v. Matthiesen et al
as 2:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jesus M Simms
Defendant:
B Matthiesen, Inspector Dobson and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simms v. Dobson et al
as 2:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Jesus M Simms
Defendant:
Inspector Dobson, Milwaukee County Sheriffs Department, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Viacom International Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv00639
Plaintiff:
XYZ Corporation and Viacom International Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, good mascot Store, Almond Kathie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Harrington v. Nordentoft et al
as 2:2021cv01182
Plaintiff:
John Harrington
Defendant:
Aaron Nordentoft, Chaos Farms LLC and Madeline Simms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02570
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Simms v. Illinois Army National Guard
as 3:2021cv03091
Plaintiff:
Marcus Simms
Defendant:
Illinois Army National Guard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeal et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00341
Defendant:
C.O. Sabo, Sgt. Scott, Shan Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn LaFollette, Cameron Belk, Sr., Roderick Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simms v. Joyner
as 3:2021cv50103
Petitioner:
Ruben Simms
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Choi v. Simm Associates, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01161
Plaintiff:
Kyu Choi
Defendant:
Simm Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
