Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Speer v. Kotteman et al
as 3:2018cv03015
Plaintiff:
David L Speer
Defendant:
. Kotteman and . Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMO Glock GMBH 22 pistol,40 caliber, SN: WTP564; et al
as 2:2017cv00405
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Glock GMBH 22 pistol,40 caliber, SN: WTP564, Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle, 556 caliber, Springfield Armory pistol and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Pizano v. Speer et al
as 4:2017cv04255
Plaintiff:
Elias Pizano
Defendant:
Robert M. Speer and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv04142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Speer v. Smallwood et al
as 3:2017cv00214
Defendant:
Jay Smallwood and Joseph Gentile
Plaintiff:
Brent Speer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speer v. Adams County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2017cv03069
Plaintiff:
David L Speer
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff's Department, Adams County Jail, Brent Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEER et al v. COOK INCORPORATED, et al
as 1:2016cv00660
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. SPEER and MARCIA SPEER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wright, Jason v. Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Wright
Defendant:
Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections, Sauk County Public Defenders Office, Sauk County Dept of Corrections Unit #811 Parole and Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01218
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
