Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Marshall Spiegel v. Michael Kim
as 18-2449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL SPIEGEL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. KIM
Mike Spiegel v. Ashwood Financial, Inc.
as 18-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE SPIEGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ASHWOOD FINANCIAL, INC., an Indiana corporation
Marshall Spiegel v. Corrine McClintic, et al
as 18-1070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL SPIEGEL
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRINE MCCLINTIC and VILLAGE OF WILMETTE, a municipal corporation
SPIEGEL v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv04320
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
MAXIMILIAN A. SPIEGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall Spiegel v. James Reynolds, et al
as 17-3344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL SPIEGEL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES T. REYNOLDS, JIM REYNOLDS, KRISTINA HIXON REYNOLDS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Marshall Spiegel v. G. Michael Halfenger
as 17-2760
Petitioner:
MARSHALL SPIEGEL
Respondent:
G. MICHAEL HALFENGER
Party-in-Interest:
DAVID A. NOVOSELSKY, VIRGINIA E. GEORGE and UNITED STATES TRUSTEE
Al Remal Al Lame'a for Food Import LLC et al v. Alejmaa Alarabi Bank et al
as 1:2017cv03439
Plaintiff:
Al Remal Al Lame'a for Food Import LLC , Tareg Ezzeddin M. Ahmed , Habiba Ahmed El Hermau and others
Defendant:
Alejmaa Alarabi Bank, Ali Hassan Mohammad Albourji, Ramzi Musbah Hadod Ishtawe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Novoselsky v. Spiegel et al
as 2:2017cv00477
Plaintiff:
David Alan Novoselsky
Defendant:
Marshall Spiegel, John S Xydakis, Neil R Meccia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Spiegel v. 1618 Sheridan Road Condominium Association et al
as 1:2016cv10935
Plaintiff:
Marshall Spiegel
Defendant:
1618 Sheridan Road Condominium Association , James Waite , William McClintic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
