Cases 11 - 20 of 40
YOUNG v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv02147
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, DEPT. OF JUSTICE and JEFF SESSIONS
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oruta et al v. Continental Air Transport et al
as 1:2018cv00466
Plaintiff:
CFPB, FTC, Dept of Justice and others
Defendant:
Continental Air Transport, B.E.W., Cook county and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Johnson v. U.S. Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2017cv05941
Plaintiff:
Albert Louis Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Justice , U.S. Parole Commission , Randell Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. BAKER et al.
as 2:2017cv00107
Defendant:
LT. BAKER, DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD RICHARD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Grissom, Terrance v. Rhoades, Kitty et al
as 3:2016cv00511
Plaintiff:
Terrance Grissom
Defendant:
Kitty Rhoades , Administration DOC and Attorney General Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFREDS v. US DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2014cv01929
Plaintiff:
DANA B. ALFREDS
Defendant:
JOSH MINKLER, NEW ACTING ATTORNEY and US DEPT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Ledoux
as 3:2014cv01714
Plaintiff:
Charles Richard Alsop Gilbert, Jr
Defendant:
Judyth A Ledoux, US Attorney and US Attorney General-Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swayzer v. Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2014cv03896
Plaintiff:
Gregory Swayzer
Defendant:
Dept. of Justice , Thomas Dart and Toni Preckwinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. U.S. Dept of Justice et al
as 1:2014cv01542
Petitioner:
Earl Lee Wright
Respondent:
U.S. Dept of Justice, Illinois Dept. of Corret., Michael P. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Howell v. Swain et al
as 2:2014cv02008
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Sue Swain, Harmony Goorley, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
