Cases 21 - 30 of 187
Yates v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2023pq00294
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Yates
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
USA v. Christopher Yates
as 22-2994
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. YATES
Akers v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv02469
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Dan Sproul, A. McCaffery, G. Soza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Yates, Michael v. Hoffman, Karl et al
as 3:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Michael Yates
Defendant:
Karl Hoffman, Roslyn Huneke and Medical Director, WI DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YATES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE A. YATES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Duff et al v. Rosenberg et al
as 1:2021cv06756
Plaintiff:
Kevin B. Duff, Receiver for the Estate of EquityBuild, Inc., EquityBuild Finance LLC and others
Defendant:
Mark L Rosenberg and Law Offices of Mark L. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clervrain et al v. Hupfer et al
as 1:2021cv00471
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Kyle Hupfer, Chuck Williams, Mary Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keia Yates, et al v. City of Chicago
as 21-2953
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEIA YATES, LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ and JOHNNY JIMMERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Yates v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2021pq01139
Plaintiff:
William Yates
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
