Cases 21 - 30 of 229
McCauley v. Snyder et al
as 2:2022cv02209
Plaintiff:
Timothy McCauley
Defendant:
R Snyder, . Spence, Andrea Bergstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindenberger, Deborah v. Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP et al
as 3:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lindenberger
Defendant:
Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP, Kirk Chewning, David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SOLIS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SOLIS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Solis v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq00582
Plaintiff:
Mark Solis
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SOLIS v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00462
Petitioner:
ARTURO SOLIS
Respondent:
T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Solis et al v. GSF USA, INC.
as 1:2021cv05664
Plaintiff:
ANGEL SOLIS and XOCHI HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
GSF USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harden Morales v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv04058
Plaintiff:
KYENAN HARDEN MORALES
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer Stefany Solis, Star No. 8246, Officer J. Rivera, Star No. 14101 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SOLIS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00780
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
REFUGIO SOLIS and REFUGIO SOLIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
