Cases 21 - 30 of 79
WOMBLES v. BRIDGES OF INDIANA INC.
as 2:2019cv00025
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH A. WOMBLES
Defendant:
BRIDGES OF INDIANA INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
NEWPORT v. INDY STEEL ERECTORS, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv02328
Defendant:
Indy Steel Erectors, Inc., INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENATAL REINFORCING IRON WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 147, INC. and IRONWORKERS LOCAL 22, INC.
Plaintiff:
Samuel Newport and SAMUAL NEWPORT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. REVMOUNTAIN, LLC et al
as 1:2017mc00055
Defendant:
ABSOLUTELY WORKING, LLC, ACTION PRO WHITE, LLC, ANASAZI MANAGEMENT PARTNERS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Walton v. Pence et al
as 2:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Darcel Walton
Defendant:
Michael Richard Pence, Derek P Usman, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges v. Allen County Sheriff Dept et al
as 3:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
John Arthur Bridges, Jr
Defendant:
Allen County Sheriff Dept, Richard W Karcher and Mr Ecenbarger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweather-Brown v. Rodgers et al
as 3:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Quintin Jamar Mayweather-Brown
Defendant:
Brad Rodgers, Jhon Perry, Steffany Bigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02913
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bridges v. USA
as 1:2016cv00220
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jason Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
