Cases 21 - 30 of 317
SIDWELL v. SEARLES
as 1:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Chester Sidwell
Defendant:
Carly Searles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Stevens et al v. Thor Motor Coach Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00349
Defendant:
Robin Eileen Stevens, Thomas Chester Stevens, Thor Motor Coach Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Allsup v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq01288
Plaintiff:
Chester Allsup
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCoy v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03078
Plaintiff:
Chester McCoy
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rusk v. Mueller et al
as 3:2023cv00953
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rusk
Defendant:
Cailee Mueller, Doctor Kahn and Chester Mental Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. Chester Mental Health Center
as 3:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Patrick V Weaver
Defendant:
Chester Mental Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rusk v. Mueller et al
as 3:2023cv03067
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rusk
Defendant:
Cailee Mueller, . Kahn and Chester Mental Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PENDER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv06975
Plaintiff:
CHESTER G. PENDER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Chester
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gregory Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Mason v. Day et al
as 3:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
French Mason and French Chester Mason Bey
Defendant:
Day, Butler, Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
