Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00494
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vazquez Vargas v. Chief Executive of Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
Quirino Vazquez Vargas
Defendant:
Chief Executive of Department of Homeland Security, Chief of the Medical Department of Homeland Security, Chief Executive of Immigration Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00455
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniel Bakalik v. Pat Quinn, et al
as 14-3638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. BAKALIK
Defendant - Appellee:
PAT QUINN, Chief Executive of Illinois, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of Illinois Department of Corrections, JOHN DOE, Tool ARB's Chief Supervisor and others
Armstrong v. Clydes Delicious Donuts et al
as 1:2013cv05744
Plaintiff:
Craig Armstrong
Defendant:
Clydes Delicious Donuts, Chief Executive Officer, Isidor Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CAMPBELL v. BIGLARI HOLDING et al
as 1:2011cv00565
Defendant:
SARDAR BIGLARI, BIGLARI HOLDING, MISTY KENDRIX and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE W. CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tyree Jointer v. Prestige Brands, et al
as 10-2983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYREE L. JOINTER
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESTIGE BRANDS and MARK PETTIE, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
