Cases 21 - 30 of 52
HOWARD v. KERIS et al
as 1:2018cv01838
Defendant:
DOUGLAS R. BITNER, DARLING, MARY K. HEIMAN and others
Plaintiff:
LANCE HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Darling Ingredients
as 1:2018cv00143
Plaintiff:
Alejandra Morales
Defendant:
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pittman v. Darling Ingredients Inc.
as 2:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Brian Pittman
Defendant:
Darling Ingredients Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Anthony Darling
as 17-2175
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY DARLING
Bravo v. Lanning (Star #11945) et al
as 1:2017cv02636
Plaintiff:
Christian Bravo
Defendant:
Dennis Lanning (Star #11945), Patrick Darling (Star #7134), Charles Heinen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2017cv02369
Plaintiff:
Christian Bravo
Defendant:
Dennis Lanning (Star #11945), Patrick Darling (Star #7134), C Heinen (Star # 15961) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type:
Other Statutes
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2016cv03396
Defendant:
CHRISTINA ANDERSON, ROBERT ANDREWS, BOBBIE ANTHIS and others
Plaintiff:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Schaden v. Contreras et al
as 1:2016cv09563
Plaintiff:
Kurt Schaden
Defendant:
Antonio Contreras and Darling Martinez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981
ESTATE OF TAMMY PEREZ v. MORGAN COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2016cv00645
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., CHRISTINA ANDERSON, ROBERT ANDREWS and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF TAMMY PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv01934
Defendant:
United States of America , Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Thomas E. Perez and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
