Cases 21 - 30 of 133
KIFER v. EVANSVILLE BUILDING AUTHORITY et al
as 3:2020cv00115
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE BUILDING AUTHORITY, HASSELER, KELLY FINK and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. KIFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield, Howard v. Peissig, Emily et al
as 3:2020cv00269
Defendant:
S Novak, Emily Peissig, Kevin A. Carr and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Howard Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berg, Jordan v. Schultz, Gwen et al
as 3:2020cv00185
Defendant:
Sue Novak, Sgt. Richard Sedevic, Brian Gustke and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Berg
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard v. Fink et al
as 3:2020cv03046
Plaintiff:
Donald E Beard, Jr
Defendant:
Joshua Fink, Parole Agent's Office, Prisoner Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl McDaniel v. Salam Syed, et al
as 20-1044
Defendant / Appellee:
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SALAM SYED, Doctor, SUSAN NOVAK, Warden, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL JOSEPH MCDANIEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Finks v. Saul
as 1:2019cv08078
Plaintiff:
Robert Finks
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07043
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McMillian, Oscar v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2019cv00859
Defendant:
Mr. Lucas Weber, Correctional Officer Kopfhammer, Captain Gwen Schultz and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar B. McMillian
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02747
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
