Cases 21 - 30 of 147
Bachner, IV v. Vaudrey et al
as 3:2020cv50018
Defendant:
Julie A. Davis, Marcus D. Bieschke, David K. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Edward F. Bachner, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Kuebler, et al v. Vectren Corporation, et al
as 19-2973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL KUEBLER and JAMES DANIGELIS
Defendant / Appellee:
VECTREN CORPORATION, CARL CHAPMAN, DERRICK BURKS and others
Davis v. Kennedy
as 1:2019cv01287
Petitioner:
James H Davis
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Teri Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Layman v. Classic Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00465
Defendant:
C-Trans Realty, LLC and Classic Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James H Layman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OBERT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv00673
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. OBERT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WRIGHT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03822
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JAMES H WRIGHT, JR. and JAMES H. WRIGHT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Higgason v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00771
Petitioner:
James H Higgason, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Undetermined:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KENT v. VECTREN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv02263
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENT
Defendant:
PATRICK K. MULLEN, VECTREN CORPORATION, CARL L. CHAPMAN and others
Interested Party:
MICHAEL KUEBLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Higgason v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00550
Petitioner:
James H Higgason, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NISENSHAL v. VECTREN CORPORATION et al
as 3:2018cv00121
Defendant:
PATRICK K. MULLEN, MICHAEL L. SMITH, VECTREN CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NISENSHAL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
