Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Smith v. Greatbanc Trust Company et al
as 1:2020cv02350
Defendant:
David Caito, GREATBANC TRUST COMPANY, Board of Directors of Triad Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SMITH v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv06143
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2020cv50052
Defendant:
Governor of Illinois, I.D.O.C. and Archer Daniels Midland Corporation
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brim et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00229
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated, Combe Products, Inc., Combe International Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Brim, Joseph McGregor, Victor Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00049
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Jail and Deputy De Lao
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS JR v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2017cv00570
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, C. MCELFRESH, JAMES SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor et al v. Snieder et al
as 2:2016cv02290
Plaintiff:
Jamie Taylor, Telly C Young, Avers Douglas and others
Defendant:
Thomas Snieder and Macon County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2016cv02289
Plaintiff:
Telly C Young, Avers Douglas, Jerry Harris and others
Defendant:
Jay Scott and Jeffery Giesler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. SINGH et al
as 1:2015cv01421
Defendant:
SAVEEN TRUCKLINES, INC. and BALVIR SINGH
Plaintiff:
JAMES SMITH and JOHNNA J SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Smith v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv03704
Plaintiff:
James Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
