Cases 21 - 30 of 2,412
Ahrens v. Bennett
as 1:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Cody Ahrens
Respondent:
Kimberly Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams II v. Cavazos et al
as 3:2024cv50128
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Williams II
Defendant:
Kimberly Cavazos, Dana L. McCormick, Sue R. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv02668
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Charles Davis, III
Defendant:
Cook County, Kimberly M. Fox and Municipal Local Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeanne Hedgepeth v. James Britton, et al
as 24-1427
Plaintiff:
JEANNE HEDGEPETH
Defendant:
JAMES A. BRITTON, KIMBERLY CAVILL, ANNA KLIMKOWICZ and others
Logan v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2024cv02602
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Logan
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. Wexford Health Source et al
as 3:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Willie Robinson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Rob Jeffries, Matthew Swalls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujano v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Adam Anthony Lujano
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Edward Villazobos, Dominique Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abduba Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Michael Abduba Dida and Mohamed Abduba Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
