Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Newsom v. Neil et al
as 3:2018cv00945
Defendant:
T Leon, A Gordon and Ron Neil
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Newsom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv01984
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Jesse Mays
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Det. Pokuta, J.D. Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scaife v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv00390
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Scaife
Defendant:
MC Williams, JD Newsome and DM Biyskal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATHORY v. HALL et al
as 4:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
LUKE A. BATHORY
Defendant:
KYLE HALL, LUCAS NEWSOM and ALLAN RITCHIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newsom, Andrae v. Percy, Doug
as 3:2017cv00499
Plaintiff:
Andrae Newsom
Defendant:
Doug Percy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsom v. Allen County Sheriff
as 1:2016cv00434
Plaintiff:
Nathan Newsom
Defendant:
Allen County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv50360
Plaintiff:
John K. Adams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Domingez, Neilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newsome v. Madison County, Illinois et al
as 3:2016cv01103
Plaintiff:
Tilia Newsome
Defendant:
Madison County, Illinois , Madison County, Illinois Sheriff's Office and Unknown John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00474
Plaintiff:
Christopher McCray , Osbert Campbell , Darryl Abrams and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
