Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv04121
Plaintiff:
Christian Dior Couture, S.A.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Beverly Tew, christopher keller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
FRAZIER v. CARTER
as 2:2017cv00519
Defendant:
K. ALLEN, B. BENDEKOVICH, HEATHER BLASINGANE and others
Plaintiff:
JASPER L FRAZIER
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pagan et al v. Fay Servicing, LLC
as 1:2017cv05795
Plaintiff:
David Pagan and Cristina Ortiz
Defendant:
Fay Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pagan et al v. REV Recreation Group Inc
as 1:2017cv00256
Plaintiff:
Isabel Gomez Pagan and Morris Jack Hedges, Sr.
Defendant:
REV Recreation Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
RSUI Indemnity Company v. Noble Network of Charter Schools et al
as 1:2017cv02665
Defendant:
Noble Network of Charter Schools and Angel Pagan
Plaintiff:
RSUI Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Pagan
as 1:2016cv06505
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Pagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sroga v. Hondzinski et al
as 1:2016cv05796
Plaintiff:
Kevin Sroga
Defendant:
P.O. Hondzinski, Raymound Souchet, LeRoy Kaminiski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Kyle Pagan
as 16-1496
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KYLE PAGAN
Pagan v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv01121
Plaintiff:
Juan Pagan
Defendant:
Dr Shah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
