Cases 21 - 30 of 1,524
Carroll v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Jermichael Carroll
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Close Armstrong, LLC, et al v. Trunkline Gas Company, LLC
as 24-1630
Plaintiff:
CLOSE ARMSTRONG, LLC, RANDALL L. DICKSON and JAYMIE DICKSON
Defendant:
TRUNKLINE GAS COMPANY, LLC
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FINCHER v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
TRAVON FINCHER
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRETT v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
MARKESE GARRETT
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Hepp
as 2:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v Hepp
as 2:2024cv00400
Petitioner:
Henry L Watson, III
Respondent:
Randall R Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hewlett v. Thomsen et al
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Damien Shontell Hewlett
Defendant:
Justin L Thomsen, Brandon Fischer, Tanner Leopole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Marcus T Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
CO Green, Randall Hepp, CO Veguilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
