Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Jones v. Visor, Jr. et al
as 1:2016cv02046
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Roy Visor, Jr. and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, and AbbVie Products, LLC
as 1:2015cv06308
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, and AbbVie Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Jones v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2015cv06318
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. CARPENTER et al
as 2:2014cv00347
Defendant:
WILLIAM CARPENTER, GREG KEHL, UNKNOWN COUNTY JAIL BOOKING SUPERVISOR and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jones v. Anglin et al
as 2:2012cv02242
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Keith Anglin, Lamar Coleman, Dennis Laker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Anglin et al
as 1:2012cv06715
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Keith Anglin, Lamar Coleman, Dennis Laker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. National Cart Co, INC
as 1:2012cv01186
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
National Cart Co., Inc. and National Cart LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Roscoe, et al v. Cook County, et al
as 12-1528
Plaintiff:
KIM YOUNG, RONALD JOHNSON, on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated, WILLIAM JONES and others
Appellant:
ANTHONY ROSCOE
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, MICHAEL F. SHEAHAN, CALLIE BAIRD and others
JONES v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2011cv00906
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JONES
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
