Cases 31 - 40 of 653
HUBBERT v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01818
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. HUBBERT
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER LANE, JUSTIN ARNHOLT, STILLABOWER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Village of Dolton
as 1:2023cv14097
Plaintiff:
Cynthia M. Lane
Defendant:
Village of Dolton, Officer Garrett, Officer Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Frazier Industrial Company v. PPT Industrial Machines, LLC d/b/a Pacific Press Technologies et al
as 1:2023cv13380
Plaintiff:
Frazier Industrial Company
Defendant:
PPT Industrial Machines, LLC d/b/a Pacific Press Technologies and Right Lane Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
ADAMS v. DILDINE
as 1:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEE ADAMS
Defendant:
LANE DILDINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00811
Petitioner:
Willie Lane
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TRIMPE v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
SARA TRIMPE
Defendant:
LANE and ALAMO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv07178
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Lane
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Loera, Acey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
LAWSON ALLEN
Defendant:
LANE and WEISINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLIS v. LANE
as 1:2023cv01516
Petitioner:
BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Respondent:
CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Loreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07138
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Lane
Defendant:
LOreal USA Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Softsheen Carson, LLC and others
Executor:
Alysia Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
