Cases 31 - 40 of 7,571
Brown v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv07692
Defendant:
Loreal USA Products, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Plaintiff:
Dimple Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00715
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ratliff v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01598
Defendant:
John Doe 12, Dr. Meyers, Mrs. Luking and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Henry v. Parsons et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Defendant:
Robert Russell, Brown, Parsons and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams-Adoku v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2024cv07584
Defendant:
Officer Wulf, County of Cook, Sergeant Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Tascha Williams-Adoku
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kilgore v. Pappas et al
as 1:2024cv01056
Defendant:
Brown County Wisconsin and George Pappas
Plaintiff:
David John Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Brown v. Roth et al
as 2:2024cv01055
Defendant:
H Steffen Enterprises, LLC, Joshua Ryan-Michael Roth and West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Brenda Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ambers v. Tippecanoe County et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Defendant:
David S. Byers, Jared W. Davis, Tippecanoe County of and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E Ambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee Brown v. Nancy Bowens, et al
as 24-2160
Defendant:
NANCY BOWENS and TRACY THOMPSON
Plaintiff:
LEE A. BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
