Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 163
BOWLES v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03204
Defendant: ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC., JANE DOE, H. WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff: RANDALL BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2020cv02669
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, STEVEN CARTER and H. WINNINGHAM
Plaintiff: RANDALL BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Bowls et al
as 3:2020cv00914
Defendant: Brandon Hall and Chariston Bowls
Plaintiff: TerOliver Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOWLES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv06209
Defendant: COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff: DONALD BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Monique Bowling
as 20-2685
Defendant / Appellant: MONIQUE S. BOWLING
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BOWLING v. CITY OF FISHERS
as 1:2020cv01671
Plaintiff: ROBERT BOWLING
Defendant: CITY OF FISHERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BOWLING v. GRIFFITH et al
as 2:2020cv00240
Defendant: F. LITTLEJOHN, BEDWELL, MRS. T. DAVIS and others
Plaintiff: STEVEN BRADLEY BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLING v. BROWN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00254
Defendant: RICHARD BROWN, K. HOBSON, WEXFORD and others
Plaintiff: STEVEN BRADLEY BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mesquita v. Brazilian Bowl, Inc., an Illinois Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01541
Defendant: Tony Ferreira, individually, Brazilian Bowl, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Lawrence Tobia, individually and others
Plaintiff: Kayc Mesquita
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hamlin v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv01141
Plaintiff: Earnest Hamlin
Defendant: Waveland Bowl, City Of Chicago, PO Collazo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?