Cases 31 - 40 of 1,375
STANFORD et al v. H.S.B.C BANK et al
as 1:2023cv02194
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. STANFORD and SOFTWHO
Defendant:
H.S.B.C BANK, BANK OF THE OZARKS, CHASE BANK, U.S. BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Farley v. JPMorgan Chase Short-Term Disability Plan et al
as 1:2023cv01635
Plaintiff:
Tracie Farley
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Short-Term Disability Plan, JPMorgan Chase Employee Relations Executive, JPMorgan Chase & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
New v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
as 3:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Robert New and Rob New
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Robbie Moore v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 23-3244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBBIE J. MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB JEFFREYS and CHASE WILHELM
Rivera v. Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Fidjiana Montilla Rivera
Defendant:
Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Barker v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 1:2023cv15609
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kay Barker
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davisson v. Elk Grove Village et al
as 1:2023cv15312
Plaintiff:
RYAN DAVISSON
Defendant:
ELK GROVE VILLAGE, a Municipality, Kyle Besthoff, Ori Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
