Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IN RE: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA ISSUED TO NON-PARTY SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. IN CELLAIRIS FRANCHISE, INC. AND GLOBAL CELLULAR, INC. V. MICHAEL DUARTE, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 2:15-CV-00101-WCO (N.D.GA
as 1:2017mc00007
In Re:
IN RE: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA ISSUED TO NON-PARTY SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. IN CELLAIRIS FRANCHISE, INC. AND GLOBAL CELLULAR, INC. V. MICHAEL DUARTE, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 2:15-CV-00101-WCO (N.D.GA and SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.
Luis Duarte v. Reed Richardson
as 16-3123
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUIS DUARTE
Respondent - Appellee:
REED A. RICHARDSON
Davidson v. Lake County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Demonshea Davidson
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Mark Curran, D.C. Uchiek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown-Tess v. Second Round LP et al
as 2:2015cv02305
Plaintiff:
Karie C Brown-Tess
Defendant:
Second Round LP, Blitt & Gained PC, Joseph Duarte and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Duarte et al v. BJ Construction Group, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv11590
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Duarte , Jesus Duarte and Eduardo Duarte
Defendant:
BJ Construction Group, LLC and Justin S Fara
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Duarte, Luis v. Richardson, Reed
as 3:2015cv00682
Petitioner:
Luis Duarte
Respondent:
Reed A. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eric Bartl v. John Z. Lee
as 15-3302
Petitioner:
ERIC BARTL
Respondent:
JOHN Z. LEE
Party-in-Interest:
CITY OF CHICAGO, ELADIO GASPAR, Chicago Police Officer; Star #8488 and FRANCISCO DUARTE, Chicago Police Officer; Star #10400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05751
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
