Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Cornille v. Cation et al
as 3:2013cv03171
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Cornille
Defendant:
Richard Cation, Ester Martin, Randy Pfister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv03176
Plaintiff:
Carrol Lake , John Stevens and Ester Richardson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Officer Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COPPER v. GADBERRY et al
as 2:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. COPPER
Defendant:
MARLA GADBERRY, HAYNES, ESTER HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason et al v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10347
Plaintiff:
Ester Mason and Angela Mason
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc, Zimmer Holdings Inc and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
James v. Tilden et al
as 1:2012cv01376
Plaintiff:
Kierra Lacey James
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, Alton Angus, Jose Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Ester et al
as 1:2012cv01217
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Melissa A Ester and Timothy D Ester
Cause Of Action: Mortgage Foreclosure
Esters v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv03695
Plaintiff:
Kimberly R Esters
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Taylor, Jr. v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv07386
Plaintiff:
John E Taylor, Jr
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Kevin C. Halloran, Allan Karraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shawn Patterson v. Sylvia Mahone, et al
as 11-1206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SYLVIA MAHONE, ESTER MARTIN, RICHARD CATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
