Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Gunn et al v. Stevens Security & Training Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06314
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gunn , Martinez Haymer and Thomas Carl
Defendant:
Stevens Security & Training Services, Inc. and Al Stevens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gunn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00423
Plaintiff:
Leroy Gunn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael's Grain Farm, Inc. et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2017cv00320
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael's Grain Farm, Inc, Michael's Grain Farm, Inc., Fred Timothy Donaldson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GUNN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01668
Plaintiff:
ANGELA GUNN
Defendant:
TRAVIS KALANICK and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gunn v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06267
Plaintiff:
Robert Gunn
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gunn v. Ciukaj et al
as 1:2016cv06015
Plaintiff:
Raymond Christopher Gunn
Defendant:
Sargeant Ciukaj and Officer Dankha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2016cv05541
Plaintiff:
Paul E Gunn
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Lilly USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannon v Gray et al
as 2:2015cv01370
Plaintiff:
Billy Cannon
Defendant:
Timothy Gray , Daniel Layber, David Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunn v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv09772
Plaintiff:
Spencer Gunn
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Gunn v. Polley, et al
as 1:2015cv06800
Petitioner:
Bennie Gunn
Respondent:
Zach Roeckeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
