Cases 31 - 40 of 343
USA v. Regis Hoskins
as 23-1749
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
REGIS HOSKINS, also known as Mad Dog
Hoskins v. Hiland et al
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
LaDarrius Hoskins
Defendant:
Hiland, Ethan Stark, Ashley Haseleu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Theresa Hoskins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
James Hoskins v. Christopher Ertl, et al
as 23-1277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES HOSKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER J. ERTL, OWEN PIOTROWSKI, THOMAS DEBOER and others
Don Hoskins v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 23-1260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DON HOSKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Hall v. Adams et al
as 2:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hall and Stephen A Hall
Defendant:
Lt Adams, Lt Chamberlain, CO Hoskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherrill v. Houston et al
as 3:2022cv02813
Plaintiff:
Shawn Sherrill
Defendant:
L. Houston, Mr. Hall, Mrs. Prescott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Luster-Hoskins v. Hartshorn et al
as 2:2022cv02245
Plaintiff:
Angel Luster-Hoskins
Defendant:
Pat Hartshorn, Young, Bobbie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Burgess et al
as 2:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hall
Defendant:
Lt Burgess, CO Holzhueter, CO Cowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
