Cases 31 - 40 of 273
Paul Horne, et al v. Caleb Johnson, et al
as 23-1446
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL HORNE and DIANNA FREEMAN, individually and on behalf of M.W. and J.C.
Defendant / Appellant:
CALEB JOHNSON, MATT NORDQUIST, MATT SCHROEDL and others
Snodgrass, Charles v. Dino, Officer C.O. et al
as 3:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Snodgrass
Defendant:
Officer C.O. 2 Dino, Sgt. Hains, U.M. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horn v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq00663
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Shirley Horn
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HORNS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2022cv02406
Petitioner:
VINCENT HORNS
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horn v. Boyd et al
as 2:2022cv02220
Plaintiff:
Charles Horn
Defendant:
Carla Boyd, The City of Urbana, Illinois, Carol Mitten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
