Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Thomas v. Miller et al
as 1:2016cv07612
Plaintiff:
Joel Thomas
Defendant:
Matt Miller, J Eric Pittman, Kane County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Peoples et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00847
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peoples , Elijah Reedy , Michael Nichols and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Langston v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06838
Plaintiff:
Arthur Langston
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. , Abbott Laboratories , AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Langston v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10424
Plaintiff:
William Langston
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Langston v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2014cv00763
Plaintiff:
Thomas R. Langston
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
LANGSTON v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00074
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN LANGSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIE G. MAFFETT v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
KYLE ANDERSON, LARRY A ANDERSON, JEREMY BIRDWELD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Langston et al
as 3:2012cv01089
Plaintiff:
Farron Kelly
Defendant:
MR Langston, Karen Jaimet, Dylan Luce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
