Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brandon v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01137
Plaintiff:
Fabian Brandon
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Marcus Hardy, Michael P Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovell Jones v. Department of Child Services, et al
as 18-1563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOVELL J. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES and DAWN MOORE, Case Worker at Department of Child Services
Blackman v. Group O, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00765
Plaintiff:
Lovell Blackman
Defendant:
Group O, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2017cv04604
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and DAWN MOORE
Plaintiff:
LOVELL JAUHON JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Drys, Brian v. Thorpe, James et al
as 3:2017cv00776
Plaintiff:
Brian F. Drys, Jr.
Defendant:
James Thorpe , Kathy Lovell, Meredith Mashak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Martin v. Ron Neal, et al
as 17-2778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. MARTIN, also known as KEVIN MARTIN, also known as KEVIN LOVELL MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
RON NEAL, Superintendent, CASE WORKER SINDER, SERGEANT FIZER and others
UWM Student Association, et al v. Michael Lovell, et al
as 17-2499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UVM STUDENT ASSOCIATION, LENA-ROSE M. ABU SAIF, ANDRES G. AGUILAR and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL LOVELL, Doctor, BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM, STUDENT ASSOCIATION AT UWM and others
Nerstrom v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv04681
Plaintiff:
Kim J Nerstrom
Defendant:
The United States of America and James A. Lovell Federal Healthcare Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
