Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Cooper et al v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company
as 2:2014cv02035
Plaintiff:
Keith Cooper , Gary Denny , Mark Burlison and others
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WOODS v. COOKE et al
as 1:2014cv00079
Defendant:
NURSE CLARK, C. COOKE, OFFICER CULVAHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. ZATECKY
as 1:2013cv01349
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WOODS
Respondent:
ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. ZATECKY
as 1:2013cv01348
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WOODS
Respondent:
ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quiroz v. JC Penney et al
as 3:2012cv00873
Plaintiff:
Everon Quiroz
Defendant:
JC Penney, Pam Spaich, Michael Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hosea v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2012cv01489
Plaintiff:
Jason Douglas Hosea
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, City of Normal, McLean County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. City of Berwyn et al
as 1:2012cv01900
Plaintiff:
John Michael Woods
Defendant:
City of Berwyn and Ronald Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Woods v. Levenhagan
as 2:2011cv00373
Petitioner:
Michael Woods
Respondent:
Mark Levenhagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00792
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas, Jeremy White, Joseph Mueller and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
WOODS v. WELLS et al
as 2:2011cv00218
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, R. WELLS and DR. WILDES
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
