Cases 31 - 40 of 14,500
MCDOWELL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER R. MCDOWELL
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Noa v. Strange
as 3:2024cv50221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Noa
Defendant:
Scott C Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Willie Bounds v. Kirsten Johnson, et al
as 24-1973
Plaintiff:
WILLIE R. BOUNDS
Defendant:
KIRSTEN JOHNSON, RANDY JONES and ZACK HENDERSON
Jeffrey Akard v. Mark Sevier, et al
as 24-1971
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY AKARD
Defendant:
MARK R. SEVIER, Warden, COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
R. Jeffrey & Associates, Inc. v. Temple Beth Am
as 1:2024cv04670
Plaintiff:
R. Jeffrey & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Temple Beth Am
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
R. v. Starr Austen & Miller, LLP
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
G. R.
Defendant:
Starr Austen Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Barnes v. USA
as 3:2024cv01441
Petitioner:
Shermarie R. Barnes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RROS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN et al
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
RROS and BROOKIE R. MORRISON
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, IN, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blake Billups v. Cody Cammack, et al
as 24-1954
Plaintiff:
BLAKE ATLAS BILLUPS
Defendant:
CODY CAMMACK, HENRY CUNNINGHAM, AMANDA R. MICHALEK and others
Hancock v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01431
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Carl R Hancock
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
