Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Thayer v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv11010
Plaintiff:
Kyleigh Thayer
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Barr Laboratories Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JEFFERS v. HANKS et al
as 1:2012cv00049
Defendant:
JOHN FLOWERS, S GARD, CRAIG HANKS and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY R. JEFFERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffers v. Hanks et al
as 3:2011cv00503
Plaintiff:
Leroy R Jeffers
Defendant:
Craig Hanks, John Flowers, S Gard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THAYER-BALLINGER v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
PAMELA THAYER-BALLINGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
TAYLOR v. STINE et al
as 1:2011cv00060
Defendant:
DR. M'S ELLERT, HANKS, M'S PRICE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2010mc00069
Respondent:
TIMOTHY PAUL ALCORN, PAUL NEJAT ALP, DANIEL BAXTER WANN ALTMAN and others
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Thayer v. Keating et al
as 1:2010cv02806
Plaintiff:
Andy Thayer
Defendant:
James Keating, Carlos Mota, Patrick Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andy Thayer v. Ralph Chiczewski, et al
as 10-1974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDY THAYER
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH CHICZEWSKI, CITY OF CHICAGO and UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO
JEFFERS v. HANKS et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Defendant:
JOHN FLOWERS, S GARD, CRAIG HANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffers v. Hanks et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Leroy R Jeffers
Defendant:
Craig Hanks, John Flowers, S Gard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
