Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Wilson v. Martin et al
as 1:2015cv04680
Plaintiff:
Jewneus Wilson
Defendant:
Daniel Martin, Shoba Rilay, James Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gould v. Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv09562
Plaintiff:
Kirstie Gould
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Martin Teresi, Robert McCallum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare and Pension Funds v. Mac 1, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv09028
Plaintiff:
Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Welfare and Pension Funds
Defendant:
Mac 1, Inc. and Lynell McCallum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coffman et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2012cv10287
Plaintiff:
Paula Coffman and Roselani McCallum
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlex Laboratories Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Osborne et al
as 1:2012cv00530
Plaintiff:
Henry C. Hill
Defendant:
Kenneth L Osborne, Mark A. Nelson, Emir T. Depaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Mccallum et al
as 1:2011cv02947
Plaintiff:
Darron K Collins
Defendant:
Richard Mccallum , Evan Komosa and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wisconsin Built, Inc. v. TJCA Dallas, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00603
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Built, Inc.
Defendant:
TJCA Dallas, LLC and Tim McCallum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amerson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv04630
Plaintiff:
Dorian Amerson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer Robert McCallum, Officer James Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCALLUM v. LEIST et al
as 1:2009cv01256
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCCALLUM and ROBERT MCCALLUM
Defendant:
JEFFREY LEIST, MUNCIE POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF MUNCIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
