Cases 41 - 50 of 2,170
MOORMAN v. HILL et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
KIR MOORMAN
Defendant:
M HILL, FUMI and FADOTRIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company v. Unterbrink et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Shelter Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
JEFF UNTERBRINK, JOSHUA HILL and SAMANTHA HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Hill v. Perkins et al
as 1:2024cv01812
Plaintiff:
Deonte Hill
Defendant:
Perkins, Thomas J Dart and Cook County Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. WCCF et al
as 3:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bernell Hill
Defendant:
WCCF and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Zoerner et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
David Zoerner, Ryan Hill, D Naef and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Porcha Hill
Defendant:
Target Corp and Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hill v. AutoZone Stores LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael D Hill
Defendant:
AutoZone Stores LLC and Natasha Lefevra
Other:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Payton et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ernest Payton, Tommy Hill, Marcus Wright and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00460
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hill and Kenneth Hill
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
