Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 111
BELL v. GRUBBS et al
as 2:2018cv00501
Defendant: CHAD GRUBBS, JAKE and TIPPECANOE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT. JAIL
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE ADRIAN BELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tartareanu et al v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00422
Plaintiff: Daniela Tartareanu and Adrian Tartareanu
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rangel v. Meyer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00413
Defendant: Steven P Meyer, Valerie Church and Matthew D Boulac
Plaintiff: Adrian G Rangel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Lacy v. Harner et al
as 3:2018cv00826
Defendant: LaPorte County Jail and Harner
Plaintiff: Adrian Eugene Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv02958
Plaintiff: ADRIAN L. JENKINS
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
PHILLIPS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02489
Defendant: COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK, INC., WILLIAM COOK EUROPE and others
Plaintiff: ADRIANE PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porras et al v. Tomacu et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00191
Plaintiff: Anthony N Porras and Paloma Porras
Defendant: Dorin Tomacu , Adrian Chitanu , Impel Union, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENNETT v. LAYTON
as 1:2018cv01197
Petitioner: ADRIAN BENNETT
Respondent: NORMAN CHAFFINS and JOHN R. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rangel v. Tippecanoe, IN County of et al
as 2:2018cv00131
Plaintiff: Adrian G Rangel
Defendant: Tippecanoe, IN County of and Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
VASQUEZ v. SHERMAN et al
as 2:2018cv00139
Defendant: P. CHATMAN, J. E. KRUEGER, SHERMAN and others
Plaintiff: ADRIAN VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?