Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bryant v. Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.
as 1:2013cv06367
Plaintiff:
Angela C. Bryant
Defendant:
Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Schneider v. Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.
as 1:2013cv06108
Plaintiff:
Douglas R Schneider
Defendant:
Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Bassett v. Wise et al
as 1:2013cv06082
Plaintiff:
Gino Bassett, Sr.
Defendant:
Lucas Wise, Oscar Simmons, Robert Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hosea v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2012cv01489
Plaintiff:
Jason Douglas Hosea
Defendant:
City of Bloomington, City of Normal, McLean County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bassette et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv07607
Plaintiff:
Cleodis Bassette , Annette Bassette, Lucas Bassette and others
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Norway, E. Cato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
VALDEZ v. SCROGGINS et al
as 1:2012cv01259
Defendant:
JEFFREY ARNOLD, BASSETT, BOWERS and others
Plaintiff:
SANTIAGO VALDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF INDIANAPOLIS, INC. v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY et al
as 1:2012cv01246
Name Changed Per Order Of 10/31/12:
GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC. and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF INDIANAPOLIS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Abernathy et al v. Chicago
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Tony Abernathy , Phillip Adams , Juan Ahedo and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
