Cases 41 - 50 of 168
BOWLING v. CITY OF FISHERS
as 1:2020cv01671
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOWLING
Defendant:
CITY OF FISHERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BOWLING v. GRIFFITH et al
as 2:2020cv00240
Defendant:
F. LITTLEJOHN, BEDWELL, MRS. T. DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BRADLEY BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLING v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00254
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, K. HOBSON, WEXFORD and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BRADLEY BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mesquita v. Brazilian Bowl, Inc., an Illinois Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01541
Defendant:
Tony Ferreira, individually, Brazilian Bowl, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Lawrence Tobia, individually and others
Plaintiff:
Kayc Mesquita
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hamlin v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv01141
Plaintiff:
Earnest Hamlin
Defendant:
Waveland Bowl, City Of Chicago, PO Collazo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLING v. WEXFORD
as 1:2019cv04492
Defendant:
WEXFORD
Plaintiff:
DAMON TRAVIS BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bumbalough et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06277
Plaintiff:
Kadin Bowling, Kyle Ardelean, Tiffany Marie Teubert and others
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc. and PAX Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWLES v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv02757
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
RHONDA BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Oasis International Group, Limited et al
as 4:2019mc00006
Defendant:
Oasis International Group, Limited, Bowling Green Capital Management, LLC, 4Oaks, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Not Yet Classified:
Burton W. Wiand and Peter J. Grilli
Petitioner:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
