Cases 41 - 50 of 113
BRISCOE v. PRETORIUS et al
as 1:2018cv04070
Defendant:
GEORGE WHITE, H. ANDREWS, GASKIN and others
Plaintiff:
THEODORE BRISCOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snyder v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv50339
Plaintiff:
Chance T. Snyder
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Erdmann v. Bilkovski
as 2:2018cv01524
Defendant:
Dr Bilkovski
Plaintiff:
Chance Lee Erdmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erdmann v. Froehlich
as 2:2018cv01497
Plaintiff:
Chance Lee Erdmann
Defendant:
Judge Jeffrey S Froehlich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millennium IP, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv05856
Plaintiff:
MILLENNIUM MEDIA, INC. and MILLENNIUM IP, INC.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", SHOPYUHUI, Lianyungang Xinglong Crystal Trade Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wallow v. Does
as 2:2018cv00774
Plaintiff:
Chance Wallow
Defendant:
Officer Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosati's Franchising, Inc. v. Chances on 6th, LLC
as 18-2063
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROSATI'S FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
CHANCES ON 6TH, LLC, now known as Chicago Pizza Kitchen, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosati's Franchising, Inc. v. Chances on 6th, LLC n/k/a Chicago Pizza Kitchen, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00668
Plaintiff:
Rosati's Franchising, Inc.
Defendant:
Chances on 6th, LLC and William Jachimek
Counter_claimant:
Chances on 6th, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Rosati's Franchising, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew, Chance v. Eckstein, Scott
as 3:2017cv00818
Petitioner:
Chance William Andrew
Respondent:
Scott Eckstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
