Cases 41 - 50 of 53
John Chong-Man Kim, et al v. CIR
as 13-2491
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN CHONG-MAN KIM and SEUNG HEE KIM
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Ciara Farris v. St. Anthony Hospital et al
as 1:2012cv08291
Plaintiff:
Ciara Farris
Defendant:
The United States , St. Anthony Hospital, Lawndale Christian Health Center and others
Respondent:
Kee Chong Kim and Dae Kwak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Yang et al
as 1:2012cv02473
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Siming Yang , Prestrige Trade Investments Limited , Caiyin Fan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Lim v. Lim
as 2:2011cv00980
Petitioner:
Meow Chu Lim
Respondent:
Khor Chin Lim
Counter_defendant:
Hao Liang Chong, HSBC Holdings, Scott Walker and others
Counter_claimant:
Khor Chin Lim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chanel, Inc. v. Wang et al
as 1:2011cv05618
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Yin Min Wang, Chong Jiong Wang and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Yi v. Fox Valley Motorcars et al
as 1:2011cv05132
Plaintiff:
Chong Su Yi
Defendant:
Fox Valley Motorcars and Lotus USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew Allen v. Douglas Chang, et al
as 11-2244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW N. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
ELGIN MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, DOCTOR CHONG and DOCTOR HUSAIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Comerica Bank v. 74 Leo, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv05376
Defendant:
74 Leo, Inc. and Chong Kook Kim
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
