Cases 41 - 50 of 303
COBB v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL COBB, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY and COLUMBUS, IN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Hefly et al
as 4:2022cv04189
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Y Hefly, S Jumper, G Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBB SR v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv02391
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL THOMAS COBB SR
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Powers v. Athena Cobb, et al
as 22-3158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ATHENA COBB, PAULA LODGE and JOHN AND JANE DOES
Arrington v. Epperson et al
as 4:2022cv04161
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
William Epperson, P. Lodge, A Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Cobb et al
as 4:2022cv04160
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
A Cobb, Paula Lodge and John and/or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COBB v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv02037
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL SR COBB
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT AT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Jumper et al
as 4:2022cv04146
Plaintiff:
Keith Hill
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, A Cobb and A Hoyt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
Phillip D Cobb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
