Cases 41 - 50 of 154
Duncan v. Gomez et al
as 1:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
Mantez Duncan
Defendant:
David Gomez, Anna McBee, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamez v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gamez
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Gomez and . Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
Romeo Jackson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Warden David Gomez, Warden Kenneth Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Young et al
as 1:2022cv01275
Plaintiff:
Kentes West
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Gomez, Lt. Keenan Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shipp v. Gomez et al
as 1:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Gregory Shipp, Christopher Dixon, Eric Johnson and others
Defendant:
David Gomez and Rob Jeffreys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pledge v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00786
Plaintiff:
James Pledge
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Jeremiah Daley, David Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granat v. Gomez et al
as 1:2022cv00356
Petitioner:
John Mateus Granat
Respondent:
David Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Gomez et al
as 3:2021cv50481
Petitioner:
James Devon Anderson
Respondent:
David Gomez and Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enge et al v. Henze et al
as 1:2021cv06397
Plaintiff:
Choice Enge
Defendant:
Dr. Marlene Menze, Warden David Gomez, Major Coles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Allen v. David Gomez
as 21-3215
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARNELL ALLEN
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID GOMEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
