Cases 41 - 50 of 20,733
Perez v. Home Depot Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv08123
Defendant:
Home Depot Corporation, John Doe #2, Edward Ted Decker and others
Plaintiff:
Fred F Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AbbVie Inc. v. BeiGene, Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv08167
Defendant:
BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Huaqing Liu, BeiGene, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
AbbVie Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Fisher v. White et al
as 3:2024cv02140
Defendant:
Robert Spears, John Doe 1, John/Jane Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Wonne C Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. PRETORIUS et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Defendant:
MELINDA MOSS, SERGEANT COOPER, ROBERT DUPREY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Noble et al
as 2:2024cv01136
Defendant:
Compliance Officer Prea, Jon Noble, Security Director Pusich and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman, Sidney v. Barrett, Kalvin et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Defendant:
Sgt. M. Conners, John Doe, Kalvin D. Barrett and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lee Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Trickle v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv08121
Defendant:
Miller, John Does, Klimek and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Trickle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayo v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv08127
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Jane Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Michael C Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feldpausch v. Kotteman et al
as 3:2024cv03245
Defendant:
. Kotteman and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Ron Feldpausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
