Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Hatcher v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05749
Plaintiff:
William Hatcher
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatcher et al v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05744
Plaintiff:
William Hatcher and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
HATCHER v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01131
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY R. HATCHER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hatcher v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00586
Plaintiff:
Sandra Hatcher
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HATCHER v. MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE et al
as 1:2014cv00649
Defendant:
BYRERS, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE and PLAINFIELD SHORT TERM OFFENDER PROGRAM FACILITY
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HATCHER v. ROHANA et al
as 1:2014cv00413
Defendant:
JENNIFER BARNES, KATHY S. EDRINGTON, RAJOLI NAVEEN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatcher v. Gary Community School Corporation
as 2:2013cv00353
Plaintiff:
Ragen H Hatcher
Defendant:
Gary Community School Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv50930
Plaintiff:
Richard Hatcher
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
HATCHER v. ROHANA et al
as 1:2012cv01486
Defendant:
JENNIFER A. BARNER, KATHY S. EDRINGTON, Dr. NAVEEN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
