Cases 41 - 50 of 282
Brown v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Angela Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Carey Hinton
as 23-1018
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CAREY HINTON
Hinton et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05760
Plaintiff:
Larry Hinton and Roy Hinton
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lisle, Jr. et al v. Simpson et al
as 1:2022cv05137
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Lisle, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Simpson, Hoffman, Rockwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HINTON et al v. PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01841
Plaintiff:
Michelle M Hinton, Braden M Hinton, Thomas B Hinton and others
Defendant:
PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
HINTON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06872
Plaintiff:
PEGGY HINTON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MYNATT v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00322
Defendant:
JARED MYNATT, VANIHEL, NURSE COAKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc., Robert Jeffreys, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
JASON S. PERRY
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DANA SKINNER, S. CRICHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowrey v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lowrey
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Melvin Hinton, Shane Reister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
