Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Todd v. Cook County et al
as 1:2010cv05170
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Todd
Defendant:
Cook County, Cook County Sheriff Dept., Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRESK v. CASTILLO GARCIA et al
as 1:2009cv00774
Plaintiff:
PAUL D. GRESK
Defendant:
J.A. CASTILLO GARCIA, CARLA K. PITTS and MICHAEL S. KURA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 (c)(1) Findings, Concl. & Proposed Judgment
Hill v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2009cv02943
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Hill
Defendant:
M.A. Rodriguez and J.A. Pedraza, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AVILA et al v. J.A. CONRAD'S CONSTRUCTION CO., LLC
as 1:2009cv00452
Plaintiff:
MIKE AVILA, BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT FUND and BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
J.A. CONRAD'S CONSTRUCTION CO., LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHORT et al v. J.A. CONRAD'S CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC
as 1:2009cv00241
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. SHORT and LABORERS WELFARE, PENSION AND TRAINING FUNDS
Defendant:
J.A. CONRAD'S CONSTRUCTION CO. LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zver v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jason Zver and Jason Zver
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, J.A. Nowak and D.J. Striegel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTSMEN HEALTH AND WELFARE FUNDS v. J.A. CONRAD'S CONSTRUCTION CO., LLC
as 1:2007cv01600
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTSMEN HEALTH AND WELFARE FUNDS
Defendant:
J.A. CONRAD'S CONSTRUCTION CO., LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Monroe County Employees' Retirement System v. Green et al
as 1:2007cv05636
Plaintiff:
Monroe County Employees' Retirement System, Monroe County Employees' Retirement System and Monroe County Employees' Retirement System
Defendant:
Judson C Green, Christopher B Galvin, Richard J.A. DeLange and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
